5 Things from Oklahoma Loss
By Chris Lauderback
HAS IT COME TO PASS?
Urban Meyer was defiant in his defense of J.T. Barrett during the postgame interview and anyone who follows Five Things knows I've been a Barrett defender (to the point of apologist) for the last couple years.
My personal defense has been the product of not just faith in Barrett but even more so a belief the right side of the line and the entire receiving corps were at least equally to blame.
Last night was Groundhog Day as Isaiah Prince was again a turnstyle in a pass pro against a legit opponent and Barrett's happy feet and indecisiveness had him throwing late to a group of receivers he still doesn't trust whatsoever, and who in my limited view once again didn't have a ton of separation.
And it didn't help that too many plays seemed hellbent on rolling to the short side of the field, toward a right tackle who can only run block, giving plays little time to develop.
The first half saw Barrett complete 5 of 11 throws for a mere 25 yards, complemented by 10 largely predictable quarterback runs, as Oklahoma dared the brain trust and players to execute anything more than 10 yards downfield.
Barrett went 14 of 24 in the second half for 158 yards with a pick and at least one near pick but most of that was in what was, in reality, garbage time aided by Oklahoma playing soft due to score and clock considerations.
The current formula in big games of relying on dink and dunk passing coupled with a ton of obvious QB runs while mostly ignoring talented running backs and the interior offensive line simply isn't good enough to beat a legit defense as we've seen against Clemson and Penn State last year, Michigan State the year before that and on and on.
So if Meyer is going to stick it out with Barrett – which for the record, I would too at this point – something schematically and/or on the personnel/coaching front at WR has to change or else it will be Groundhog Day again in about six weeks when Penn State rolls into town.
ON THE BRIGHT SIDE, IT SHOULD'VE BEEN WORSE
The scoreboard showed 31-16 but the reality is that it should've been more like 50-16 which couldmatter if Ohio State's playcalling, pass offense and pass defense get its collective shit together, a la 2014, over the course of the season.
Ohio State was beyond lucky to be tied at 3-3 going into halftime thanks to Oklahoma's continual self-inflicted wounds including:
- Turnover on Downs after a nine-play drive to the OSU 36 stalled via a questionable 4th-and-4 fade route that fell incomplete.
- Fumble on the 11th play of a drive reaching the OSU 23
- Fumble on the 5th play of a drive via a backward pass after reaching the OSU 48
- Missed FG on the 8th play of a drive after reaching the OSU 20
Those Sooner missteps somehow kept the final score within two possessions and if by some minor miracle Ohio State pulls it together and makes a run, the memory of what actually transpired last night could soften a bit over the next three months especially if Oklahoma makes a run.
MUSHY IN THE MIDDLE
The entire back seven looked lost but the linebackers in particular were a disaster in coverage.
Credit Mayfield and the Sooner offensive staff for repeatedly dialing up opportunities for Chris Worley, Dante Booker and Malik Harrison, in particular, to bite hard on play fakes and get lost in coverage against tight ends, backs and slot guys all night long.
Two particular daggers included Worley and Booker both getting out of position on Mayfield's 36-yard touchdown toss to Dimitri Flowers tying the game at 10-10 and Harrison getting roasted on an 18-yard touchdown to Lee Morris giving Oklahoma a 17-13 lead.
Similar issues occurred last week meaning there's plenty of work to do in coverage across the linebacking corps. Worley, to my admittedly untrained eye, was fairly solid in coverage last year but not so much through two games as the man in the middle.
Booker, in his fifth year, is a bigger concern going forward since his play has been marginal enough that Greg Schiano and company have inserted the true sophomore, Harrison, quite often though the combined results have been equally unsteady over the short sample size.
SHOWING SOME LEG
On a quest for positives, let's talk about punter Drue Chrisman and plackicker Sean Nuernberger.
Chrisman, a redshirt freshman, had another stellar evening with all four punts landing inside the 20 with a net of 45.8 and exactly zero return yards:
- Punt 1: 52 yards to the OU 9
- Punt 2: 36 yards to the OU 13
- Punt 3: 48 yards to the OU 13 (though a bunk kick catch interference penalty moved it to OU 28)
- Punt 4: 47 yards to the OU 8
Chrisman's excellent night comes on the heels of last week when he punted six times, landing three inside the 20 on a 45.3 yard average.
Through two games, Chrisman and the coverage team have yet to yield a return yard with seven of the 10 punts downed inside the 20.
On the scoring front, Nuernberger, who was a forgotten man on the roster and said to be in a dogfight with true freshman Blake Haubeil through spring and fall camp, converted 3 of 3 field goals last night, connecting from 24, 24 and 32 yards.
Those numbers build on last week's 2 for 2 performance (27, 19) giving Nuernberger a nice little streak – albeit via chip shots – to start the year.
This could be a significant development if Ohio State's offense is going to struggle converting in the red zone against good teams.
Props to both guys for being early bright spots.
SEASON ON THE BRINK?
As much as last night was a clown show, it's important to remember it's early.
Your confidence level could rival mine as far as whether or not the deficiencies can and will be addressed in time for it to matter but the reality is it's a long season.
OPPONENT | TOT YDS | POINTS |
---|---|---|
OKLAHOMA '17 | 350 | 16 |
INDIANA '17 | 596 | 49 |
CLEMSON '16 | 215 | 0 |
MICHIGAN '16 | 330 | 30 |
MICHIGAN ST '16 | 310 | 17 |
AVERAGE | 360 | 22 |
The blueprint is already there for an early loss to not prove fatal and Ohio State's strength of schedule at least provides an opportunity to get back into the mix.
That said, the previous blueprint relied on guys like Zeke, Mike Thomas, Devin Smith, Vonn Bell, Eli Apple, Darron Lee and others to step up and I'm not sure there are enough wide receivers, linebackers or defensive backs on the roster capable of matching the growth and production realized from the 2014 crop that bounced back from the Virginia Tech ambush.
Right now, the chief focus has to be on an offense that has averaged just 22 points over it's last five games which is boosted by the 49 against Indiana. Points have been tough to come by thanks to an average of 360 total yards per game which also received an Indiana-boost (596) but has otherwise failed to put up more then 350 yards in four of five games.
Hey, at least the sun came up this morning.
10 Things We Learned from Oklahoma Loss!
by Tony Gerdeman
1. Now we know why the Ohio State passing game looked so good in practice.
The Buckeyes are dead last in the nation in pass defense after two weeks. That’s 130th place, if you’re keeping count. They are allowing 403 yards passing per game, and now we know why there was so much talk from players and coaches about the passing game looking good and making plays during spring and fall camp.
2. Kevin Wilson is not a magical elixir.
Over the first two games, Oklahoma and Indiana have shown how easy it can be to throw the ball, but the Buckeyes have shown us how difficult their reality is. I still believe Kevin Wilson is a good fit for the Ohio State offense, but it’s clear that the passing game is going to require more than simply a healthy sprinkling of his offensive pixie dust.
3. J.T. Barrett has trust issues.
After the game, J.T. Barrett said the issue with the passing game was that Oklahoma was dropping back into a zone and he needs to do a better job of trusting his throws and trusting that his receivers will be where they need to be. He said he could improve on not second guessing himself against the zone defense. My question to this is if the quarterback doesn’t trust himself, how much longer can the coach trust the quarterback, and should he even trust him at all?
4. Urban Meyer has trust issues.
Urban Meyer said after the game that he is not considering a quarterback change, which means that he doesn’t have the trust in anybody else to be a better option. Or maybe he has too much trust in J.T. Barrett? Regardless, the Buckeye offense will ride and die with Barrett at quarterback, and the fan base will be justifiably angry with any continued struggles on offense this season. There are also trust issues with the running backs. Meyer lamented the lack of carries for the running backs, but this issue has now spanned three offensive coordinators, four different starting running backs, and three starting quarterbacks. The common denominator is the head coach.
5. Everyone else has trust issues when it comes to Ohio State.
It is important to remember that this was just game two and the season is far from over. It was not that long ago when the Buckeyes lost the second game of the season in 2014 and went on to win a national title. The difference here, however, is that almost nobody outside the program expects a similar turnaround. The offensive coaching staff has changed, but we’ve seen this story before. Putting up another 600 yards against Army and UNLV and Maryland won’t mean anything. A win over Penn State would help, but the only thing that will fix the trust issues is a win over a national power outside of the Big Ten, and I’m not sure anybody sees that happening at this rate.
6. The Buckeyes have a punter.
When the one bright spot of a game is your punter, you have already lost. Still, redshirt freshman Drue Chrisman had four punts, averaging 45.8 yards with each kick, and putting all four punts inside the 20-yard line. He hasn’t been a surprise, but more of a pleasant confirmation of what was expected. He’s just way too busy right now, though.
7. The linebackers were exposed.
Man, that was a mess of a defensive effort in the passing game. Do people have more respect for Luke Fickell now? Lincoln Riley’s offense had the Ohio State linebackers looking like they were playing on ice. They were spun every which way. Passes were completed in front of them, but especially behind them. There were several plays where it looked like this was the first time they had ever experienced a play-action pass. Maybe this is why there is still a competition between Dante Booker and Malik Harrison. For being arguably the most athletic group of Ohio State linebackers ever, they defended the pass like a group of stiff run stoppers. We’ll find out down the road how much of the problem is scheme and coaching, and how much of the problem is the players. From the looks of last night, there is plenty of blame to go around.
8. This was a much bigger game for Oklahoma than Ohio State.
Lincoln Riley said as much after the game. They were focused on this game and they wanted payback for the way they lost last year. This was a challenge to their manhood and they responded. For Ohio State it was a big game as well, but they didn’t have the same reasons for wanting this game. I don’t know how much that impacted the game, because Ohio State could have wanted it more, but if they can’t defend the middle of the field, then nothing would have been any different. Credit the Sooners for putting the kind of weight that they did on this game. They prepared well and executed well. Just be happy they made as many mistakes as they did, or else this one could have been a four or five-touchdown difference.
9. There is no respect for J.T. Barrett’s passing from the opposition.
Indiana coach Tom Allen said their plan of attack was to take advantage of OSU’s inaccurate quarterback. Oklahoma, meanwhile, dropped in a zone and forced Barrett to fit the ball into windows. Allen ended up being surprised by Barrett’s accuracy in the second half. There was no such surprise for the Oklahoma defense. Then there were also the comments from Clemson head coach Dabo Swinney and their defense leading up to, and following, the playoff game last year. Urban Meyer is confident in Barrett, while the opposition is confident that he can’t beat them. This is a disappointing situation to be in for a program that recruits as well as Ohio State and has as many proven coaches on offense as they do.
10. Greg Schiano is very concerned.
Ohio State gave up 420 yards passing to Indiana in the season opener. Many of those yards came from quick hitters on the outside that saw perfect placement and tremendous hands. The yards came in one-on-one coverage situations on the outside, which is very different than where the 386 yards came from against the Sooners. The middle of the field was a playground for the Oklahoma offense, and they did it without their best pass catcher, as tight end Mark Andrews missed much of the game with an injury. Schiano said the issue last night was mistakes and poor coaching. Problems like that can be corrected, which is good news. The pass defense will look much better in the immediate future against Army, UNLV, and Maryland, but it won’t make a difference until we see what they do against Nebraska and Penn State. There is plenty of time to fix the issues, but having this many issues is absolutely a concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment